\section{Results}
The results show a high level of reliability. Out of the 68786 data packages that were sent in total over 98\% arrived at the server within the required time interval of 10 seconds.
\\\\
In the comparison between the MLR-Router and the TDT-Router, both using Deutsche Telekom - D1 as service provider, the amount of data packages satisfying the time-requirements where 99,63\% (68531) for the MLR-Router and 99,71\% (68587) for the TDT-Router. 99,94\% of these packages arrived in less then 2 seconds after the start of transmission.
\\\\
The most noticeable difference in the test results between both routers is the provider independent peek in package loss for the MLR-Router at the time-interval between 0 am to 1 am. For the TDT-Router no such behavior is noticeable within the dataset. (MLR Restart)
\\\\
When setting the scope at the dependencies between the reliability and the service-provider the results show that the number of packege lost for the MLR-Router using Deutsche Telekom - D1 is almost by factor 3 lower then that of the MLR-Router using 02 as service-provider. Dispite the high difereces in lost packages the 02 MLR-Router still provides a satisfying result of 98,96\% of all data-packages arriving within the demandet time-interval of 10 seconds.
\\\\
Closer inspection of the packages lost from the MLR-Router using the O2-Network there is an aditional peek in transmnission failure between 12 am and 5 pm and an aditional peek at 9 pm. (TODO can we explain this?) In addition to the MLR-Router using the D1 Network the MLR using O2 has the same peek of package loss at 0 am wich leeds to the surmise that this peek is hardware dependant.
